Summary

  • The Department of Justice (DOJ) disclosed that it had reached a preliminary plea agreement with Boeing, with the two sides still working on finalizing the wording of the agreement.
  • The plea agreement will include Boeing admitting guilt, as well as special conditions, including a three-year period when Boeing would be monitored by an independent monitor.
  • The Boeing 737 MAX crash victims’ families have opposed a plea deal.

In a court filing on July 7, 2024, the Department of Justice (DOJ), which has represented the United States government in a fraud case against Boeing, has said that the US government and Boeing had reached an agreement in principle of a proposed plea agreement related to the Boeing 737 MAX fraud charges.

The aircraft manufacturer was accused of violating its deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) in May, with the DPA stemming from the two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes in October 2018 and March 2019 involving Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines 737 MAX 8 aircraft. The DPA was finalized in January 2021, when Boeing was charged with a conspiracy to defraud the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), namely its Aircraft Evaluation Group (FAA AEG).

Agreement in principle

The July 7 filing detailed that while the DOJ and Boeing have signed the agreement in principle, the two sides are still working to document and memorialize the final terms into a written plea agreement. The DOJ said that it expected to file the final agreement on July 19, asking the court, namely the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, to delay the trial scheduling order at least until July 12.

Boeing 737 MAX 7 at Renton shutterstock_1854534436

Photo: BlueBarronPhoto | Shutterstock

Nevertheless, the DOJ emphasized that Boeing will plead guilty to the most serious readily provable offense, which was the violation of a certain section of the January 2021 DPA. In the May letter to Reed O’Connor, a District Court Judge of the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas, who has been overseeing the US versus Boeing case, the DOJ outlined that Boeing violated the DPA by “failing to design, implement, and enforce a compliance and ethics program to prevent and detect violations of the US fraud laws throughout its operations.”

In the same May letter, the DOJ said that it was still deliberating how to proceed further. At the time, Boeing was given 30 days to respond to the allegations that it had breached the DPA and describe the actions the manufacturer had taken to address the situation. At the same time, the DOJ outlined that it would continue its dialogue with the family members of the victims of the two Boeing 737 MAX crashes, airline customers, and their counsel about the next steps.

Related

DOJ Mulls Boeing Fraud Prosecution Over Fatal 737 MAX Crashes

The US Government, represented by the DOJ, has given Boeing 30 days to respond to its allegations.

Probation period and an independent compliance monitor

While the final wording of the plea agreement was still being worked on by Boeing and the DOJ, the current wording of the latest charge against the aircraft manufacturer outlined that the company will plead guilty to conspiracy to defraud the US, specifically, the lawful function of the FAA AEG. However, Boeing will not be charged with any other criminal offense to the conduct that the DOJ outlined in the DPA.

“The plea agreement will not provide Boeing with immunity for any other conduct, including any conduct that may be the subject of any ongoing or future Government investigation of the Company.”

Related

DOJ Opens Investigation Into Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 MAX 9 Door Blowout

The agency is the latest of a number of federal investigations into Boeing.

Boeing will also be fined $487.2 million, while the court will also determine the restitution amount for the two fatal 737 MAX crashes victims’ families. However, since the court determined that airlines were not harmed by the violation of the DPA, they will not be able to claim any restitution from the plane maker.

Boeing's logo in El Segundo, California

Photo: Tada Images | Shutterstock

The company will also enter into a three-year probation period, which comes with three special conditions. Firstly, the company’s board of directors will meet with the 737 MAX crashes victims’ families, and secondly, Boeing will invest at least $455 million in its compliance and safety programs during the term of the probation. Thirdly, an independent compliance monitor will oversee the company’s operations for the duration of the probation, with the US government selecting the monitor and issuing a request of proposals (RFP) for potential independent candidates.

“The monitor will prepare a confidential annual report for the Government, and file on the public court docket an executive summary of that annual report.”

The victims’ families, which called for a $24.7 billion fine for Boeing, opposed a plea deal. Citing the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), the families’ counsel, Paul Cassell, asked to discuss the plea deal with the DOJ, including any potential concessions that would be given to Boeing.

Related

Breaking: Boeing Will Plead Guilty To 737 MAX 8 Criminal Fraud Charge Related To Deadly Crashes

Under the plea deal, the planemaker will be fined more than $243 million.

Defrauding the FAA

When Boeing and the DOJ reached the DPA, the latter provided background information in the filing, which the manufacturer confirmed was true and accurate. According to the DPA’s statement of facts, Boeing had developed the 737 MAX as the successor to the highly successful 737 Next Generation (NG).

Since the FAA’s role has been to determine the airworthiness of the aircraft and the minimum level of pilot training for US-based airlines and pilots, the FAA AEG was primarily responsible for determining the training requirements. The group had compared the 737 NG and 737 MAX, mandating a minimum level – computer-based training (CBT) – of training for US pilots who would switch from the 737 NG to the 737 MAX.

According to the DOJ, mandating more rigorous training, which could include full-flight simulator (FFS) training, would result in losses for Boeing as well as passenger airlines flying the 737 MAX, which included lost revenues since pilots using the FFS to train on the new aircraft would not be able to fly passengers.

Boeing 737 MAX 8.

Photo: Boeing

As a result, Boeing and its 737 MAX Chief Technical Pilots, one of whom worked for Boeing in the role from early 2014 to June 2018, with the other overtaking their duties since then, understood that the FAA AEG relied on them and that CBT for pilots transitioning from the 737 NG to the 737 MAX would make the aircraft more attractive for airline customers.

“From at least in and around November 2016 through at least in and around December 2018, in the Northern District of Texas and elsewhere, Boeing, through Boeing Employee-1 [the 737 MAX Chief Technical Pilot working at Boeing until June 2018 – ed. note] and Boeing Employee-2 [the other 737 MAX Chief Technical Pilot – ed. note], knowingly, and with intent to defraud, conspired to defraud the FAA AEG.”

Throughout that time, the two Boeing employees knowingly withheld information about Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System (MCAS), which included information that the system’s scope was expanded beyond high-speed, wind-up turns. The expanded scope resulted in MCAS covering nearly the entire speed range of the aircraft and had contributed to the two fatal Boeing 737 MAX crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia.

Related

In Short: The Differences Between The Boeing 737NG & 737 MAX Families

The Boeing 737 MAX is heavier than the 737NG and has more fuel-efficient engines and new winglets.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *