Summary
- Wing configuration in military aircraft is determined by mission needs.
- High-wing design offers safer operations over rough terrain.
- Notable high-wing military transport aircraft include Airbus A400M and Boeing C-17.
Have you ever spotted a military transport aircraft? Have you noticed that most military transport planes have a high wing configuration – wings aligned on the upper end of the fuselage rather than the conventional mid-to-lower wing configuration?
Aircraft wings are typically attached to the fuselage in one of two primary configurations: positioned above the fuselage or below the mid-point of the fuselage. While commercial aircraft commonly feature low wings for practical reasons, military transport aircraft frequently incorporate high-wing designs.
The difference between low-wing and high-wing designs
- Wings generate lift and keep the aircraft aloft irrespective of the configuration.
- Differs in terms of design which is driven by the aircraft’s desired mission.
- The design determines floor space in the fuselage, the use of center wing fuel tank, cargo space, etc.
- The design also determines accessibility of wing-mounted engines during ramp checks and maintenance.
In terms of functionality, both low-wing and high-wing aircraft share similarities, as their primary purpose is to generate lift while in motion through the air. Nonetheless, notable distinctions exist between the two configurations.
Related
Aircraft Design & Aerodynamics: Key Principles and Concepts
The aircraft design process entails the estimation of weights, performance, structural loads, aerodynamics, controls, and propulsion.
Low wings are strategically positioned just below the midpoint of the fuselage, and this placement holds significant importance. The wing structure comprises a central wing box that integrates with this fuselage location, attached between the passenger cabin and the cargo hold.
This wing positioning ensures minimal interference with the passenger cabin while also serving as a space for certain landing gear components within the wings and wing box. Low wings are also more aerodynamic and facilitate easier access to the engines for maintenance and inspection during airport turnarounds.
Photo: Arnold O. A. Pinto | Shutterstock
Meanwhile, high wings are above the mid-point of the fuselage, and they are usually flatter, giving more ground clearance. This configuration enables safer operations over uneven terrain. However, the significance of the wing structure extends beyond that, as it facilitates unobstructed access to the fuselage, enabling efficient transportation of cargo.
In the realm of high-wing aircraft and short runways, a prevalent association exists between high-wing designs and propeller technology. Propellers have the distinct capability of delivering enhanced initial acceleration during takeoffs, surpassing jet engines. Consequently, the combination of high wings and propellers emerges as an advantageous configuration for achieving successful takeoffs from short runways, particularly those that are unpaved.
Therefore, it seems logical for military transport aircraft to be designed with high wings for particular missions and specialized cargo transportation.
Related
How Are Aircraft Designed To Mitigate The Effects Of Cargo Hold Fires?
Fire suppression systems feature multiple redundancies.
Notable high-wing military transport aircraft
All major aircraft manufacturers worldwide have developed military transport aircraft. Some of the notable examples include the Airbus A400M Atlas, Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, Lockheed C-130 Hercules, and the Embraer C-390 Millennium. What sets these aircraft apart is their common feature: a high-wing design.
Airbus A400 is a European four-engine turboprop military transport aircraft. It was designed to replace older transport aircraft such as the Lockheed C-130. The A400M is sized between the C-130 and the Boeing C-17 Globemaster III. It can carry heavy loads and can use rough landing due to its high-wing design. According to Airbus,
“The A400M combines the capability to carry strategic loads with the ability to deliver even into tactical locations with small and unprepared airstrips and can act as a frontline-tanker. One aircraft that can do the work of three – the A400M.”
Photo: Airbus
Boeing’s C-17 Globemaster III is a large military transport aircraft that was developed for the United States Air Force (USAF) from the 1980s to the early 1990s by McDonnell Douglas. Having ended its production in 2015, the C-17 is still a famous military transport aircraft able to airlift cargo close to battle areas.
Related
Airbus Upgrades Firefighting Capabilities Of The A400M
The new roll-on/roll-off firefighting kit does not require any modification to the aircraft.
According to the United States Air Force (USAF),
“The C-17 is capable of rapid strategic delivery of troops and all types of cargo to main operating bases or directly to forward bases in the deployment area.”
“The ultimate measure of airlift effectiveness is the ability to rapidly project and sustain an effective combat force close to a potential battle area.”
Photo: USAF
In contrast, the Embraer C-390 Millennium is one of the latest medium-sized twin-engine military transport aircraft. It took to the skies for the first time in 2015, although it has yet to achieve the same level of popularity as the A400M or C-17.
The Brazilian manufacturer, Embraer, states,
“The C-390 Millennium is the new generation military multi-mission aircraft that brings unrivaled mobility, high productivity and operation flexibility at low operational costs on a single and unique modern platform.”
Related
Which Countries Have Ordered The Embraer C-390 & Who Will Be Next?
North America is a highly strategic region for Embraer.